This past weekend, I was taking a survey on spirituality, church, and culture, and I was particularly troubled by a question that asked me to rate the importance of the following issues in the church (what I felt should be emphasized): Bible study, prayer, worship, fellowship, evangelism, saving souls, moral issues, and social concerns (homelessness, poverty, war, environment, etc).
Now these types of questions disturb me tremendously for a number of reasons. First, I pretty much have my own lexicon of faith and very often my definitions don’t match anyone else’s I know (like Humpty Dumpty in Through the Looking Glass, “when I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.”). For example, I know that when I am talking about evangelism, a word I have struggled to reclaim and reframe in my faith vocabulary, I am talking about, as my profile states, “sharing the good news that life – and the world – can be radically different”, and for me evangelism is lived out by helping people to discover what brings meaning and purpose to their lives. (this is definitely an oversimplification for I could write an entire essay on my view of evangelism, yet that is not the focus of this posting). I also know that some people define evangelism as “saving souls”. So, while it was probably safe for me to assume that the surveyors did not have my unorthodox definition of evangelism in mind, I don’t know what they mean since “saving souls” was listed next.
Secondly, and more importantly, I have no idea what the surveyors mean by moral issues. And I was even more distressed that issues of homelessness, poverty, the war in Iraq, and the environment, plus the myriad other issues that could be included in the perfunctory “etc”, did not fall under “moral issues”. Is war not a moral concern? And aren’t issues of economic justice and care of the earth moral imperatives for people of the Christian faith along with people of other faiths?
Morality, in public discourse, has come to mean two things: abortion and homosexuality. Occasionally, pornography sneaks in there to form what I have heard called, the “unholy trinity”. Interestingly, these issues all deal with sex on one level or another (a topic for another blog?). Now, don’t get me wrong, I think sexual ethics are issues of moral concerns. What bugs me is the assumption by much of the media and the public that these are the ONLY moral concerns. They are not.
I am a person of faith. I am a minister of the Christian faith. And I am person who strives to live a moral and ethical life. And let me tell you, when I go to the polls tomorrow, I will be making moral and ethical choices, informed by my faith and my faith tradition. And I will be voting for candidates who will work for economic justice, the elimination of poverty, equality in health care and marriage, and the dismantling of systemic racism. I will also be voting for candidates who seek to find non-violent resolutions to conflict and who support basic human rights for all people, including “enemy combatants”. And I will be voting for candidates who tell the truth.
It will be my moral vote, and I know it will be heard.
Note: This morning, as I sat in my kitchen finishing this blog entry, a news story came on NPR, talking about Protestants for the Common Good, and they interviewed my colleague Rev. Jennifer Kottler, who serves as Deputy Director for the organization. Rev. Kottler spoke of affordable housing and other issues of justice (and not just charity) as being concerns, indeed “moral concerns”, for people of faith. This moment of synchronicity (the interview coming on as I prepared to post) confirmed my need to share these thoughts. And it also made me proud to have a Disciple colleague doing such powerful work in the world. Check out http://www.thecommongood.org/; they are good folks.
Monday, November 06, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
13 comments:
Amen Rachel! Very well said... there are so many issues of moral concern, yet so often the focus comes down to one issue, ie. "God is on our side because God hates fags."
I think it is important to remember the words of Lincoln as we vote: "My concern is not whether God is on our side; my greatest concern is to be on God's side, for God is always right." The God that I know is right about Love: Love your neighbor as yourself. The God that I know is right about Peace: Make every effort to live in peace with all men.
Those are the moral issues that I consider foremost - and they affect all the other issues you mentioned: war, poverty, equality, human rights, the list goes on. Let's look at the candidates and ask simply, "Who is standing on the side of Love?"
"Who is standing on the side of love?"
Let's make up buttons that ask this question for the election in 2008!!
I'd wear that button! I've appreciated the posts of yours I've read so far and I appreciated your comment on my blog, thanks for reading. I'm wondering if you are acquainted with Wicker Park Grace, a new PC(USA) church developing in Wicker Park under the leadership of Nanette Sawyer. I think you and she could be good colleagues to one another. You've probably met, but if not, I'd love to introduce you.
Glad to make your acquaintance through RevGalBlogPals.
Peace be with you.
As a sociologist who teaches research methods, I always warn students about the difficulty of making survey items for religious variables. Questions on literalism, fundamentalism and other "bible beliefs" often use vague terms and ignore imporatn contexts (i.e., people's values change as they age and specific historical settings can alter one's moral stands). So, students often choose behavioral measures since they improve reliabilty of the answers (i.e., the frequency of prayer). However, in a cruel twist, these behavioral matters often have a smaller impact than these esoteric concepts.
So, so true. I am increasingly thinking of my positions on a variety of political issues as being driven by my moral principles. I am increasingly looking for politicians who are willing to stand up for their conception of morality on these issues, even if some of those stands are unpopular. And I would be very happy to see general recognition that "moral issues" does not mean conformity to some particular paradigm of sexuality in a religious context.
Yep, wonderful post.
Have you seen 'Thank you for Smoking'? It is a great movie that is basically lampooning spin and how it runs our culture and elections; not the justice issues that should be.
Make me a pin!
Welcome to RevGalBlogPals!
Interesting thoughts. Looking forward to reading more from you in the future. Welcome to the RevGals!
Put me down for a button too! I wish I could wear one for tomorrow's election. All the campaign ads are on my last nerve at this point! Anyhow, welcome to RGBP Rachel.
I too do not like those ranking type questions when you have no explantion of what the words actually mean. And yes, evangelism has an entirely different meaning based on who you talk with and their context.
For me it is always about bearing witness to / telling/ showing the Good News in word and deed. So, therefore it includes tackling many of the other issues they listed up. Well, Saving Souls? Not soemthing I do.
Interesting. The moral issues can not be ignored. Neither can the 10 Commandments, and Jesus' command to love God first and each other second. When we all sort that out, He'll be back.
;)
Deb
welcome to the web ring!
Sorry I hadn't gotten around to this sooner. I definitely share your frustration with the fact that the idea of "morality" has been boxed up into one category (that of sexual ideology), and that those who would preach the idea of "good, wholesome American values and morals" are, more often than not, the same folks who would turn around and blaspheme the very nature of their religion by extorting their followers, belittling the faith of others, and promoting hatred for anyone whose values differ.
I have always held to the principle that being a moral individual has more to do with how you treat others who are different than how you conform to a certain type of thinking. I just don't see how somebody who hates an individual for what they do can be more moral than the person who engages in these "immoral" acts, but has nothing but love in their heart. That's really all I've got for now. I'm going to add a haiku to your newest blog.
amen!
Welcome to the RGBP.
I second the idea that you and Nanette would be great colleagues--you all are doing good work in the city.
I live in the suburbs, so should you ever need a place to get out of the hustle and bustle, stop over and email me! :-)
Post a Comment